<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers &#38; Attorneys &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawyersection.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawyersection.com</link>
	<description>A Resource for Individuals Seeking An Attorney</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 05:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Beachfront Property in Florida is Now Public Beach</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersection.com/florida-beach-luxury-who-owns-the-beaches-in-florida/12/02/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersection.com/florida-beach-luxury-who-owns-the-beaches-in-florida/12/02/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DLaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beach in florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best beach florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida legal battles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south florida beach]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersection.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Florida Beach Luxury, throw some sand in someones yard, and you then own that yard! The state of Florida thought this was a great tactic when they started the sand nourishment project...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersection.com/florida-beach-luxury-who-owns-the-beaches-in-florida/12/02/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judges Have Already Decided&#8230;How Do You Feel?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersection.com/judges-have-already-decided-how-do-you-feel/11/23/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersection.com/judges-have-already-decided-how-do-you-feel/11/23/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DLaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clarence thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oral argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court justices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersection.com/?p=345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guilty before you even stand trial!! Judges are routinely admitting that they have made up their minds on guilt before a trial even starts....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersection.com/judges-have-already-decided-how-do-you-feel/11/23/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Rebates Sparks A Kickback Lawsuit From NY Attorney General.</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersection.com/intel-rebates-sparks-a-kickback-lawsuit-from-ny-attorney-general/11/16/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersection.com/intel-rebates-sparks-a-kickback-lawsuit-from-ny-attorney-general/11/16/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DLaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Rebate Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini CEO Intel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersection.com/?p=368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel denies wrongdoing in a rebate lawsuit filed by New York City Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo. The lawsuit claims Intel is holding back all competition by offering rebates to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersection.com/intel-rebates-sparks-a-kickback-lawsuit-from-ny-attorney-general/11/16/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sanford Wallace Is The King Of Spam And Unpaid Judgements</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersection.com/sanford-wallace-is-the-king-of-spam-and-unpaid-judgements/11/06/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersection.com/sanford-wallace-is-the-king-of-spam-and-unpaid-judgements/11/06/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DLaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam guerbuez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Can Spam Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanford wallace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersection.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Can-Spam act was developed to stop the sleezy mass email marketers that are sending out malicious links. One big time "king of spam" or known by others as "king idiot"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersection.com/sanford-wallace-is-the-king-of-spam-and-unpaid-judgements/11/06/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>URLs In A Kentucky Courtroom</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersection.com/urls-in-a-kentucky-courtroom/11/03/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersection.com/urls-in-a-kentucky-courtroom/11/03/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DLaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Civil Liberties Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain name ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gambling in Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky Anti-Gambling laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky Supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyers for gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URL cloaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersection.com/?p=323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this case, the state of Kentucky has confiscated 141 gambling related domain names, saying the domain names violate the state's anti-gambling law.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersection.com/urls-in-a-kentucky-courtroom/11/03/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worried About Traveling To Mexico?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersection.com/worried-about-traveling-to-mexico/10/28/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersection.com/worried-about-traveling-to-mexico/10/28/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DLaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[h1n1 virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersection.com/?p=305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this year,  There were many advisories about traveling to Mexico and its many vacation spots, and tourism dropped drastically for awhile.
There were some truths that were left out of much of the discussion concerning Mexican travel, and some of those thoughts are still persisting.  Travel to Mexico is still somewhat sluggish, but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersection.com/worried-about-traveling-to-mexico/10/28/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Insider Information Is Considered A Crime</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersection.com/why-insider-information-is-considered-a-crime/10/23/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersection.com/why-insider-information-is-considered-a-crime/10/23/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DLaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider Trading Sanctions Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC findings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersection.com/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past week, six top financial investors, including one billionaire, were arrested and charged with fraud and conspiracy for having illegal information before making their trades, bringing them riches that they didn&#8217;t deserve.  They were accused of making millions of dollars from this information over the course of 3 years.
Most people don&#8217;t understand this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersection.com/why-insider-information-is-considered-a-crime/10/23/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The H1N1 Vaccine Battle In New York</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersection.com/the-h1n1-vaccine-battle-in-new-york/10/21/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersection.com/the-h1n1-vaccine-battle-in-new-york/10/21/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DLaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[h1n1 virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care rights in new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyer section medical law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersection.com/?p=235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an intriguing legal battle going on in New York State as it concerns the H1N1, otherwise known as the swine flu, vaccine.  The battle is between the rights of individuals versus the state&#8217;s right to try to protect its citizens.
In September, the Health Commissioner of New York decided that every health care [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersection.com/the-h1n1-vaccine-battle-in-new-york/10/21/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
